NFL 2010 Week 17 Picks

Week 17 of the NFL regular season is here!

I have to say – I’m kind of looking forward to just sitting down and watching football without having to worry about how it affects my fantasy team. (The East Dillon Lions came in second, in case you were wondering, after putting up their lowest point total of the season. Choke job!)

Last week was meh (8-8 week, 118-92 season), so let’s see if I can finish this crazy season on a high note.

CAROLINA @ ATLANTA
Like my friend Jon Foster, a die-hard Falcons fan (who knew there was such a thing?!), said, “If the Falcons can’t win at home against Carolina, they don’t even deserve to go to the playoffs!” (Much less have a #1 seed.)

PITTSBURGH @ CLEVELAND
As feisty and competitive as they looked in the early and midway points of the season, the Browns have looked inept and lifeless to close out the year. Bummer.

MINNESOTA @ DETROIT
Can’t wait to see what sort of weather calamity messes with the Vikings this week. Anyway, I’m going with the Lions, who are on fire! (Lions on fire = three straight wins.)

OAKLAND @ KANSAS CITY
Chiefs coach Todd Haley is just crazy enough to play his guys a little bit too long just so he could win this game. (And finish 2010 with a perfect home record.)

MIAMI @ NEW ENGLAND
My other friend Jared summed up Dolphins QB Chad Henne thusly: *$*O#&@^@!!!! (I think it may be time for some changes in Miami.)

TAMPA BAY @ NEW ORLEANS
I’d love to pick the Baby Bucs, but they simply don’t have enough guys to go into New Orleans and pull this out. The latest casualty was starting rookie WR Arrelious Benn. (Damn, you can tell I’m getting reinvested in the Bucs because I didn’t even have to look up how to spell “Arrelious Benn.”)

BUFFALO @ N.Y. JETS
The Jets are pretty much locked into the sixth seed, so I’m looking for Rex Ryan to give his guys some rest. (Hopefully, the entire team will take a rest from having embarrassing videos/tapes/photos/texts/telegrams about them released.)

CINCINNATI @ BALTIMORE
The Ravens still have a chance to win the division, so I expect them to win a tough game over the Bengals and Carson Palmer, who looked positively giddy after the cancellation of the TOcho show last week.

JACKSONVILLE @ HOUSTON
I know David Garrard and Maurice Jones-Drew are out, but I’m just done with the Texans.

N.Y. GIANTS @ WASHINGTON
I know Rex Grossman is still in, but I’m just done with the Giants.

DALLAS @ PHILADELPHIA
Sorry, I can’t help myself: I had a 1.5 point lead over my opponent in the fantasy finals going into Tuesday night’s game. I had DeSean Jackson, and he had Percy Harvin. With Joe Webb throwing to Harvin (and the Vikings secondary depleted), let’s just say I liked my chances. Thanks for nothing, Eagles! Watch them explode against Dallas.

ARIZONA @ SAN FRANCISCO
Mike Singletary. I’ll miss you and your craziness most of all.

CHICAGO @ GREEN BAY
I know Lovie Smith SAYS he wants to beat the Packers, but risking the health of his team is simply not worth it going into the playoffs. Plus, the Packers look like they’re in ass-kicking mode.

TENNESEE @ INDIANAPOLIS
After all that’s been said and written, would YOU want to face the Colts in the first round of the playoffs?

SAN DIEGO @ DENVER
TEEEEEBBBBOOOOWWW!

ST. LOUIS @ SEATTLE
I don’t love the idea of rookie QB Sam Bradford (pictured, right) going into Seattle and locking up the division for the Rams…but then I remembered the Seahawks are starting the not-quite-immortal Charlie Whitehurst.

NFL 2010 Week 16 Picks

Christmas shopping, TV reruns and my general laziness have recently kept me from writing in my blog as often as I’d like to.

(Maybe I’ll have my “Black Swan” and “True Grit” reviews in by 2011, maybe I won’t. Maybe I’ll do a Top 10 list of the Best Movies and TV shows of the year, but I probably won’t.)

Still, I’ve managed to sneak my musings on the NFL season every Thursday and this week is no different. Maybe I should be paying more attention to that as well, since I had a pretty sad week (7-9 week, 110-84 season).

Starting tonight, there will be NFL games on four of the next five nights, so let’s jump right in:

CAROLINA @ PITTSBURGH
Carolina showed spunk I didn’t think they had last week in winning their second game of the season, but I don’t like their chances at all against a (depleted) Steelers team looking to bounce back from that tough loss against the Jets.

DALLAS @ ARIZONA
I know they’ve looked slightly better in recent weeks, but I’m not rushing out to buy a John Skelton jersey just yet. (Or any other jersey for that matter…those things cost like $70!)

WASHINGTON @ JACKSONVILLE
I’m in the title game for my fantasy football league. If I win, I get $300. We play a two-QB format, and Drew Brees is locked in as one of my quarterbacks. For the second spot, I’m trying to decide between Eli Manning at Green Bay (in what will probably be a frigid, low-scoring game), Sam Bradford (who’s been brutal lately) at home against the Niners or…wait for it…Rex Grossman (pictured, left)!

In a related story, (though I like the Jags to win the game) I’m leaning toward Grossman against the Jags bad pass defense. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit…

DETROIT @ MIAMI
Detroit just won its first road game since 2007! (In Tampa…Blech!) There’s no limit to what they can do!

SAN FRANCISCO @ ST. LOUIS
We all want the winner of the NFC West to finish with a losing record because it’s never happened (and so we can REALLY complain about how bad that division is), but I have a feeling one of these teams is going to rally and finish 8-8.

TENNESSEE @ KANSAS CITY
I thought the Titans had quit on their season until they blew out Houston last week. Can I please get that same exact effort this week, since my fantasy appointment has Jamaal Charles going? Thanks!

N.Y. JETS @ CHICAGO
Is there a team more reliant on confidence and swagger than the Jets? I think they got some of that back last week, and I also like the way they play on the road. (When they don’t do well at home, the crowd becomes anxious and things get awkward in a hurry.)

NEW ENGLAND @ BUFFALO
I feel like this game will be a lot closer than people expect, but it’s pretty apparent that no one is beating the Patriots at this point. (They beat Green Bay with their C+ game last week.)

BALTIMORE @ CLEVELAND
Even though they’ve been a letdown these past few weeks, I feel like the Browns (and especially their fans) will get up for this game against division rival Baltimore. (AKA the artists formerly known as the Cleveland Browns.)

HOUSTON @ DENVER
Sorry for being “Guy Who Won’t Stop Talking About His Fantasy Team”, but both of these teams are out of it, and neither coach will be back next year. I’ve got two or three guys going in this game (if Knowshon Moreno recovers in time), so I hope there are 100 points scored in this thing.

SAN DIEGO @ CINCINNATI
When your best player is also the guy who’s been trying the hardest all year, and you lose that guy for the season, you’re in trouble. When that guy is Terrell Owens, you’re REALLY in terrible shape.

INDIANAPOLIS @ OAKLAND
This feels like one of those games where the Raiders control the clock for 35-40 minutes, but Peyton Manning wins the games with a few strategically-placed, quick-strike touchdowns.

N.Y. GIANTS @ GREEN BAY
The Giants just suffered one of the most heartbreaking losses in recent memory, but a lot of people expect them to bounce back. I don’t. I think Tom Coughlin runts of chances this year. (Especially since Bill Cowher is publicly campaigning for his job.)

SEATTLE @ TAMPA BAY
The Bucs will win this one because the Seahawks are kind of a disaster, but it’ll be too little, too late.

MINNESOTA @ PHILADELPHIA
So, basically Joe Webb is a terrible version of Tarvaris Jackson (who is a terrible version of a good NFL quarterback).

NEW ORLEANS @ ATLANTA
Drew Brees…I’ve had you as my fantasy QB for the past three seasons. You brought New Orleans a title earlier this year, and I expect you to do the same for me.

NFL 2010 Week 15 Picks

It’s crunch time in the NFL season and, more importantly, in fantasy football land.

I’m in my main league’s fantasy playoffs for the third straight year and, so far, I have no (imaginary) rings to show for my efforts.

I’m trying not to over think my week 15 lineup (Pierre Garcon vs. Vincent Jackson for my third WR spot?!) the same way I’m trying not to over think my picks. Last week was a wash (8-8 week, 103-75 season), so we’ll see what happens now.

SAN FRANCISCO @ SAN DIEGO
The Niners looked pretty great last year, so they’re due for a turd of a performance. Also, don’t we all still kind of feel like the Chargers are going to the playoffs?

CLEVELAND @ CINCINNATI
I picked both of these losing teams to win on the road last week, and they both let me down. Can I pick “tie” for this? Fine, I’ll go with the Browns now that Colt McCoy is back in the picture (and Jake Delhomme is out of it).

WASHINGTON @ DALLAS
The Panthers have a much worse record, but the Redskins are just as big a disaster zone.

HOUSTON @ TENNESEE
Think Houston WR Andre Johnson will be up for this game?

JACKSONVILLE @ INDIANAPOLIS
The Jags have pretty much done everything to show they’re legit…but I’m not going to bury the Colts until they’re in the ground and the Jaguars are standing over them with shovels.

KANSAS CITY @ ST. LOUIS
Whether Chiefs QB Matt Cassel (pictured, right) plays or not, I’m taking the Rams, who are always feisty at home. If Cassel doesn’t play, the Chiefs may not get 10 points.

BUFFALO @ MIAMI
Oh oh…Miami’s doing that thing where they hover around the outskirts of the playoff picture again. Don’t sleep on them.

DETROIT @ TAMPA BAY
Hopefully the Bucs can actually win this game AND avoiding losing a few more starters to injured reserve.

ARIZONA @ CAROLINA
I’ve got the weirdly-resurgent Cardinals beating the Panthers, but the real losers are anyone who has to watch this game. Yikes!

NEW ORLEANS @ BALTIMORE
Come on, Drew Brees! Carry me to the fantasy finals!

PHILADELPHIA @ N.Y. GIANTS
Should be a great game, but I’m going with the Eagles because of the Giants’ tendency to lay eggs at home this season.

ATLANTA @ SEATTLE
I think this game will be closer than people think…which means the Falcons will only win by about two touchdowns.

N.Y. JETS @ PITTSBURGH
Is there a worse possible place for a quarterback that is struggling with turnovers to visit than Pittsburgh? Egads!

DENVER @ OAKLAND
Come on, Knowshon Moreno! Carry me to the fantasy finals! (Definitely didn’t think I’d be saying that at the start of the year.)

GREEN BAY @ NEW ENGLAND
If Aaron Rodgers plays (which I can’t shake the feeling he will), the Packers have a chance. If he doesn’t play, the Packers may not get five first downs. Either way, the Patriots will likely continue their roll.

CHICAGO @ MINNESOTA
The Vikings options are: A.) Tarvaris Jackson and his turf toe, B.) Brett Favre and his mangled hand, C.) Third-stringer Joe Webb. Yeah, I’m going with the other team.

Desperate Housewives: Laugh Riot

Whether it’s a plane crash, a tornado, a supermarket shooting or a nightclub fire, “Desperate Housewives” knows how to finish the calendar year with style.

I’m excited to announce that we can now add “Teri Hatcher getting her stomach trampled on” to that pantheon!

I joke, but the latest annual Wister Lane catastrophe was an impressively chaotic calamity. Most importantly, this year’s disaster — a violent riot — actually had strong thematic ties to the rest of the season. (As opposed to, say, that tornado that came out of nowhere.)

We’ve known all along that Paul Young’s plan was to destroy his former neighborhood. We learned recently just now he planned to do it: by snatching up almost enough property on Wisteria Lane to build a halfway house (and send the neighborhood’s value plummeting), Paul made everyone paranoid and suspicious that someone else would sell him their house and allow him to succeed.

That paranoia allowed Paul to trick Lee into selling him his house by convincing him that Frau Farbissina (whose character’s name is actually the no-less ridiculous “Mitzy Kinski”) had already done so. (It has NOT been a good couple of weeks for Lee.)

The general feeling of uneasiness also led Lynette to seek out the help of the nearby Hydrangea Circle Homeowners’ Association, an organization that was clearly put together just so they could intimidate and beat people up with baseball bats. They may not have started the riot — which took place as the mayor of Fairview was honoring Paul for his halfway house — but they certainly helped instigate it.

The turning point in the riot seemed to come after Lee was bopped in the head with a bottle as he was violently dragged out of his car. Lynette ran over and bellowed, “Stop it — HE’S MY NEIGHBOR!” in a heavy-handed way/significant way that only worked because Felicity Huffman is a great actress.

Lynette ran over to Lee’s aid after she tried to blame Paul for the riot. Paul coolly replied that he and his ex-con buddies weren’t the ones tearing apart the neighborhood.

I’m thoroughly enjoying how much Paul is thoroughly enjoying being evil this season. That’s why I’m hoping the bullet he took to his chest at the end of the episode wasn’t fatal. Also, I REALLY hope the show’s producers don’t try to turn “Who shot Paul Young?” into “Who shot J.R.?” (It’s not even as big as “Who shot Mr. Burns?”)

Of course, that’s just one of several mysteries heading into next year.

Another big question (besides, “Why is Mike putting boobs on a snowman?”) is what will Lynette do when she finds out Renee is still pining for her husband Tom? (Notice, I didn’t say “if” she finds out.) Last week, Renee drunkenly confessed her feelings to Susan, and this week Susan spilled the beans to Tom and suggested that he convince Renee to move out of the block.

Since Vanessa Williams just got to this party, we knew that wasn’t going to happen. She tried to confront Susan at the neighborhood rally, but the two eventually got separated when a mass of humanity carried Susan away, eventually leading her to get trampled. We all know Teri Hatcher’s not going anywhere, so it was hard to get invested into whether or not she was going to be alright.

I’m not so sure whether Juanita and Gabby are going to be all right.

Juanita discovered that the reason Gabby had been crying so often was because Grace is her biological daughter. Juanita had found a letter Gabby had written to Grace (at Lynette’s suggestion) shoved Gabby hard (do we think Madison de la Garza outweighs Eva Longoria Parker?) and temporarily ran away from home. She took refuge in Bob and Lee’s car, which was pretty much the worst place she could go seeing as how Lee was Public Enemy #1.

Gabby (and Carlos) quickly came to her rescue, but it’s hard to feel for Gabby at this point. She’s been a HORRIBLE mother lately, both to Grace (trying to have Carmen arrested last week before having a change of heart) and to Juanita (by ignoring her daughter in favor or her mini-me Grace).

Then again, the person who technically incited the riot was Bree, who fired a gunshot in the air to break up a fight between Keith, his dad, and the fools who’d mistaken Keith for a con. (That’s what he gets for wearing those wifebeaters all the time.)

Keith tried to propose again at the top of the episode, but Bree still wasn’t ready to commit. Instead, she suggested they move in together. Keith seemed ok with this until his evil dad (who wants Bree to himself) messed with his head and led the couple to breakup. Keith’s dad made his move later on after “saving” Bree from a convict who’d wandered into her home. (For the record, Keith’s dad’s advancements were no less creepy than the ex-cons.)

Things don’t look great for the long-term prospects of Bree and Keith (especially with Orson apparently popping back up), but that’s one of the issues we have to look forward to in 2011. Overall, I’m pretty happy with my decision to start watching this show again.

So what’d you think of this episode? Who do you think shot Paul Young? (Lee, who owns a gun, seems the obvious choice.) When do you think Grace will be back in the picture? Finally, how much do you think Juanita can bench press?

Love & Other Drugs Review

“Love & Other Drugs” has pretty much been billed as “The Movie in Which Anne Hathaway and Jake Gyllenhaal Get Naked (That Isn’t “Brokeback Mountain.”)

Don’t believe me? Look at the poster.

The good news is that, by that standard, it ABSOLUTELY delivers. In fact, in the movie’s first hour, Hathaway is either naked or topless literally half of the time she’s on screen. (I remember making a mental note about how “Love & Other Drugs” was on its way to being the best movie of the year.)

The not-so-good news: director Edward Zwick tried to make about three different movies and didn’t always succeed.

“Love & Other Drugs” – based on the book “Hard Sell: The Evolution of a Viagra Salesman” by Jamie Reidy – stars Gyllenhaal as Jamie Randall, a charismatic but underachieving young man who finds his calling as a slick pharmaceutical rep. He meets and falls for Maggie Murdock, an alluring free spirit – you can tell she’s a free spirit from her long, flowing curly hair, her bohemian loft, and the fact that she’s an artist – who also happens to have Parkinson’s disease.

The movie is also set in the mid-1990s. Just to make sure you’re aware of this, The Spin Doctors’ “Two Princes” blares over the opening credits, while “Independence Day” and “The X-Files” play on a TV screen. The characters even dance to the Macarena at one point. (Seriously!) Anyway, the reason the 90’s setting is important is because that’s around the time Viagra came on the scene and helped Jamie become a superstar in the pharmaceutical world.

And there’s the rub. “Love & Other Drugs” tries to be both a romantic drama about a flaky guy falling for a girl who is terrified of getting close to anyone AND a period examination/satire of the pharmaceutical boom in the mid-90’s.

The movie certainly has its moments, but doesn’t completely work on either of those fronts. I actually think there’s an interesting satire to be made out of the movie’s pharmaceutical angle (especially how they get doctors like the one played by Hank Azaria to push their product), but the movie never fully goes there because when you have leads with chemistry as good as Gyllenhaal and Hathaway’s, you’d be a fool not to utilize that.

In fact, that chemistry is ultimately what ends up salvaging a lacking romantic plot that careens from realism (you’ll shudder from recognition at some of the arguments) to exhausted movie clichés. (The guy gets in his car to go after the girl he loves, and declares his love in front of a bunch of strangers – I’m surprised she wasn’t going to the airport and that it wasn’t raining.)

Then there’s Josh Gad as Jamie’s loutish brother and as the crass comic relief I’m not exactly sure the movie needed. It’s almost as if Gad – with his masturbation and sex tape shenanigans – is acting in a different, stupider movie.

Still, it all ends up being about the two stars. Gyllenhaal is solid and soulful at the appropriate times, even if he wandered in manic “Tom Cruise-as-Jerry Maguire” territory every once in a while. Hathaway is also impressive, and the sunniness the actress naturally radiates helped balance out the character’s often downbeat tendencies.

Even though “Love & Other Drugs” ultimately winds up coming up a bit short, the movie is elevated by its two ridiculously charismatic – and sexy – stars.

Love & Other Drugs…B-

NFL 2010 Week 14 Picks

Told you I’d be back.

I’m feeling good. I’m in my fantasy league playoffs for the third straight year (only person to do that), I did decently in my picks last time out (10-6 week, 95-67 overall) and I’m off to a good start this week (1-0 after the Colts-Titans game).

Let’s jump right into the rest of week 14!

CLEVELAND @ BUFFALO
I’m tempted to go with Buffalo because they’ve been feisty most of the year, despite their horrid record. Then I remembered that they have a pathetic run defense and I imagined Cleveland’s Peyton Hillis running for 180 yards and 3 TDs against them.

CINCINNATI @ PITTSBURGH
Carson Palmer just looks like he wants to go home. Any thoughts on who’ll be coaching the Bengals once Marvin Lewis gets fired. (You can’t fall for the “trying to draw the other team offsides when we have no intention of running a play” trick and keep your job, right?)

GREEN BAY @ DETROIT
This feels like one of those games where the Packers jump out to a big lead, the Lions make it more interesting then it should be before they lose by eight points.

N.Y. GIANTS @ MINNESOTA
I don’t think Brett Favre is going to play this week. And if he does, I think the Giants pass rush knocks him out by halftime.

TAMPA BAY @ WASHINGTON
The Bucs playoff hopes may be evaporating (Aqib Talib, their best player on defense is on injured reserve), but at least they get to beat up on the Redskins. Even the Titans think the Redskins are a mess.

ATLANTA @ CAROLINA
Carolina showed signs of life at Seattle last week until, apparently, someone reminded them they’re the worst team in the league, and they promptly blew it.

OAKLAND @ JACKSONVILLE
When do we start talking about Maurice Jones-Drew (pictured, left) as an MVP candidate? Maybe after he runs for another 150 or so yards against the Raiders’ suspect run defense on Sunday. (And DEFINITELY after he starts playing quarterback.)

SEATTLE @ SAN FRANCISCO
Alex Smith is back at the controls for the 49ers…and I’m back on picking against them. (Not that I ever stopped.)

ST. LOUIS @ NEW ORLEANS
I know the Rams are at the top of their division, but this one has blowout written all over it. Ok, that’s not exactly accurate. It’s more like this one has “blowout” written neatly on the side of it.

MIAMI @ N.Y. JETS
The Jets’ collective ass is still red after the spanking they took from the Patriots. Do we think Dolphins QB Chad Henne makes it to the end of this game?

DENVER @ ARIZONA
Fire your coach, start winning games. Seems like the Bengals should’ve tried this a month and a half ago.

KANSAS CITY @ SAN DIEGO
Even if Chief QB Matt Cassel hadn’t undergone an appendectomy, I’d pick the Chargers because (last week’s debacle notwithstanding) they have an annoying habit of winning games at the end of the season and somehow winding up with the AFC West title.

NEW ENGLAND @ CHICAGO
It took me more than a month, but I’m on the Bears bandwagon. (Well that, and I think the Pats are due for a letdown game.)

PHILADELPHIA @ DALLAS
Dallas is hot, and Michael Vick keeps getting nicked up here and there. I smell upset.

BALTIMORE @ HOUSTON
The Texans NEED this game if they want to finish they’re customary 8-8/9-7.

NFL Week 14 Thursday Night NFL Pick

My picks for the full weekend slate will be up before Sunday.

Just wanted to sneak in my pick for the Thursday night game on NFL Network that a good portion of the country won't be watching.

INDIANAPOLIS @ TENNESSEE

Even if the Colts didn't desperately need this game, I'd still give Peyton Manning (pictured, right, probably about to throw another interception) and Co. the nod over the increasingly-pathetic Titans.

Glee: Do You Believe In Miracles

True confessions time: I don’t really know any Christmas carols.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not completely clueless. I’ve heard all the classics – I just don’t actually know any of the words. I’m the guy who only joins in for the “FIVE GOL-DEN RINGS!!!” part during “The 12 Days of Christmas.”

What can I say? While you were learning all the words to these carols in school and with your family, I was growing up in Puerto Rico and singing about eating pork and drinking rum. (Seriously.)

So it goes without saying that I probably wasn’t looking forward to the “Glee” Christmas episode as much as other people.

The good news is that the episode mostly steered clear of well-trodden Christmas music so that the cast (and k.d. lang – more on that later) could put their own stamp on these songs. The bad news is that this may have been the dumbest episode of “Glee” yet. (And that’s saying something.)

Now, before you accuse me of being a Sue-like Grinch let me explain that I completely understand that a certain amount of cheesiness is expected (no DEMANDED) in our holiday programming.

The problem is the cheesiness in last night’s “Glee” felt artificial and forced – it was the Cheez Whiz of Christmas programming. In other words: Blech.

Let’s start with the Sue Sylvester fiasco. It was no surprise to learn that she hated Christmas. Sue rigged Beiste’s Secret Santa gig so that she would receive all the presents.(Someone explain to me why Will thought a “dog robot” would be a good idea?) This storyline actually got off to a promising start: I particularly enjoyed Will hilariously taking Sue’s phone out of the cradle as he stormed out of her office. (That dude is a badass.)

The teachers got their gifts back from Sue (and pledged to give them to charity) before Sue the Grinch (again, more on that later) stole them back again. Sue thought she’d ruined Christmas until she walked in on glee club’s final performance of the evening and saw that she had NOT crushed their spirit. That’s fine – I just don’t get why that moved her to, not only give all the presents back, but throw an impromptu Christmas Eve party for Will. Jane Lynch is a great actress and she did her best, but I did NOT buy Sue’s attitude change for a second. Plus, I don’t love when they try to make her cuddly. (But not too cuddly – she did end the episode by telling Will she hated him.) (And where the hell was Kurt during Will’s party – I get that he goes to a different school, but he and Will are obviously still in touch?)

Then there’s the Brittany-believing-in-Santa storyline.

Look, no one laughs harder at the ridiculousness that comes out of Brittany’s mouth than I do. However, there IS a line, and last night the writers crossed and made her too dumb. (I kept expecting a twist in which Brittany revealed she was just pretending, but nope…she really IS that dumb.)

Like the teacher’s storyline, it’s not like there weren’t any laughs. I liked the various glee club members asking (Black/Tanned) Santa at the mall for stuff. I’m not as on-board with Artie’s obsession with protecting Brittany’s innocence. I get that it’s supposed to be sweet, but the way he treated her like a little girl last night came off as a little creepy to me. Oh well.

Brittany’s wish to Santa was for Artie to walk. Santa Beiste tried to let her down gently, but in the end she delivered a Christmas miracle by outfitting Artie in a “re-walk.” Awwww…except! 1.) Why didn’t we hear about this “re-walk” thing during last season’s episode when Artie and Tina were researching ways he could walk? 2.) More importantly, if Beiste can afford something that is allegedly super-expensive, what the hell is she doing coaching high school football?!

See, it’s this kind of sloppiness that just kills me because there ARE some good things going on in this show. Speaking of which, let’s grade the musical performances:

“The Most Wonderful Day of the Year”…B-: This would be the super cheesy song the glee club sang as they decorated their ratty tree. There was an inherent phoniness about this number (it wasn’t like the other ones on this show), but I thought it was reminiscent of a holiday movie, so I gave it a slight pass.

“We Need a Little Christmas”…B+: The glee kids sounded good, even as they were being brutally heckled by classmates. (The teacher throwing a shoe, though funny, was too much.) This also brought up an important question: who brings a band to go caroling?!

“Merry Christmas, Darling”…B: Lea Michele’s take on The Carpenters’ song was one of those vintage “Rachel in the auditorium” performances. (She should just get a cot and live there.) Really good vocal (as usual), but I didn’t really feel anything fresh or exciting about this number. (Then again, I think Finn is kind of being a holier-than-thou douche for not forgiving Rachel, so I’m just not into that whole storyline.)

“Baby, It’s Cold Outside”…A: Although this performance was almost entirely unnecessary (pretty much just a way to get Kurt and Blaine in this episode), it was absolutely sensational. Then again, this is actually one of the few Christmas songs I really enjoy, so I’m biased. Chris Colfer and Darren Criss sounded wonderful together, and it’s kinda great that two guys can duet on a song like this on network TV, and it’s no big deal

“You’re a Mean One, Sue the Grinch”…B+: I can see that it was ridiculous, but I also thought it was pretty damn funny. I especially enjoyed Becky as Max the reindog, and Brittany with Cindy Lou Who-hair interrupting Sue. I was ready to give this performance an A, until I saw k.d. lang did the vocals. Wha?! The show is breaking its own musical sequence guidelines! Why not just have Sue sing it? (And I’m a guy who doesn’t think she should sing very often!) To me, it already sounded like Jane Lynch COULD have been singing, so why not?! Cop out!

“Last Christmas”…B+: Not sure we needed TWO songs with Rachel pining after Finn, but the Christmas tree lot setting and the performances were pretty good.(Extra points for being a Rachel/Finn duet.)

“Welcome Christmas”…B: You’d think that the song that allegedly thawed Sue’s heart and inspired underpaid teachers to give up some of their own cash would earn an “A”, but it was just aight for me.

So what’d you think of this episode? Why would Emma invite Will over for Christmas? (Come spend the holidays with the woman you’re openly pining for…and her new husband!) Which glee club member Christmas request for the mall Santa was your favorite? (Santana wants bling – no need to be more or less specific!) Finally, what IS the difference between an elf and a slave?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I Review

By definition, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I” is meant to leave you hanging. (Part II doesn’t get here until 2011.)

Fortunately, the first part in the final chapter of the Potter saga manages to be a wholly satisfying experience on its own.

“Deathly Hallows”, like the previous two installments of the franchise, is directed by David Yates. Yates has probably been the director who has most deviated from the source material (partly out of necessity, since the books were so massive by that time) to the delight of some, and the chagrin of most.

I always say that a movie should stand on its own — meaning you shouldn’t need to have read the book to be able to follow the movie. By that standard, I think Yates has been mostly successful. (I don’t so much mind the changes Yates and his writers have made. I mostly didn’t care for the rushed conclusion of “Half Blood Prince.” To me, THAT move felt more incomplete than “DH: Part I.”)

Anyway, I’m telling you all that to tell you this: Yates has absolutely hit his stride in terms of adapting beloved source material and turning it into an exciting moviemaking experience that stands on its own. (A big part of the reason is the fact that he has two movies to stretch his cinematic legs.)

Daniel Radcliffe once again stars as Harry Potter, who…ok, if you don’t know what this movie series is about by this point, why are you reading this?!
In “Deathly Hallows,” Harry, Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) — bypass their final year at Hogwarts to hunt and destroy Lord Voldemort’s (Ralph Fiennes) remaining horcruxes. The horcruxes contain pieces of Voldemort’s soul and are the keys to destroying the Dark Lord.

When I read that “Deathly Hallows” would be split into two movies, I’ll admit I was slightly annoyed. I’m not one of those Potter fans who insist that ever single detail from the book MUST be included in the movies. On top of that, all that I remembered about reading “Deathly Hallows” (besides how awesome of a conclusion it is) was how much damn camping there was. I figured if there was any book in the series that could be considerably cut down, it was “Deathly Hallows” with its never-ending/downbeat passages with Harry, Hermione and Ron in the woods.

What I didn’t think about was how strong Radcliffe, Watson and Grint have become as actors over the course of seven movies. In “Deathly Hallows” those camping passages (even though they still drag in the movie — it’s unavoidable) are absolutely essential to building each of their characters and serve to personalize and ground their magical journey.

Radcliffe is once again a strong anchor, but I was really impressed by Grint (never better or more adult) and, especially, Watson, who pretty much carries this thing the same way the annoyingly-capable Hermione carries Harry and Ron. She was pretty excellent.

Also excellent are the obscenely talented roster of British actors that play the adult roles. The more I see Fiennes as Voldemort, the more I’m creeped out by him. It’s also absolutely insane how perfect Helene Bonham Carter is as psychotic witch Bellatrix Lestrange. I’m not sure why, but I also thoroughly enjoyed how haggard Jason Isaacs looked as the disgraced snob Lucius Malfoy. Alan Rickman only has a brief scene as the treacherous, conflicted Severus Snape, but he plays it perfectly. (The chilling scene that opens the movie sends the message that this isn’t your mother’s Harry Potter.)

As for the newcomers, I wish the great Bill Nighy had gotten a bit more to do as Minister of Magic Rufus Scrimgeour. However, Rhys Ifans fared MUCH better in his brief scene as the haunted Xenophilius Lovegood (Luna’s dad). Add to that the parade of beloved returning characters (the Weasley twins) and villains (Imelda Staunton’s Dolores Umbridge) and you’ve got a jam-packed movie.

Unfortunately, that means not everyone necessarily makes it out alive (yes, I teared up near the end), which is why it’s good to see Yates at least try to give each character their own brief moment to shine.

As for what the “Deathly Hallows” are: well, Yates answers that question ingeniously with a gorgeous animated sequence that served as a fantastic way of dealing with a necessary bit of exposition. (It was more interesting than having the camera on Emma Watson as she talked.)

I’d definitely consider “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallow: Part I” more of a paranoid drama than a family movie. I know that’s disconcerting for a lot of people, but as far as I’m concerned, I’ve grown up with these characters and I already kind of consider them family. So to me, “DH: Part I” is the best paranoid family movie of the year.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I…A-

Desperate Housewives: Tomcat

Welcome to another one of my occasional “Desperate Housewives” recaps!

Ok, here’s the deal: I completely skipped the show last year, jumped back on-board this season and resumed recap duties. Unfortunately, I fell behind by a few episodes about a month ago.

Now — like a biological child you never knew you had or an old neighbor who’d been wrongfully-but-kinda-rightfully sent to prison — I’m back!

I’ve been enjoying this season. Sure, the show will never recapture its season 1 and 2 magic (and what show does?), but “Desperate Housewives” is still a soapily entertaining hour when you want to turn off your brain, enjoy a few one-liners and hang out with a saucy group of middle-aged women. (Which all rank among my favorite activities.)

In case you hadn’t guessed by last night, Paul Young laughably diabolical real estate scheme to destroy the property value of Wisteria Lane was officially revealed last night. I say “laughably diabolical” because it’s sort of a passive aggressive plan for someone who has committed murder in the past. (And for someone who stopped just short of bursting into a MWAHAHAHAHA evil laugh after triumphantly unveiling his plan to the neighborhood.)

Paul wants to build a halfway house on Wisteria Lane. The rest of the neighbors obviously don’t want a bunch of convicted felons on the block. (Unless they’re hot guys, like Mike — plus, imagine if they knew about the assorted misdeeds all these characters have committed over the years.) Anyway, Paul was soundly out-voted at a homeowners’ association meeting, until he revealed that he controlled seven votes thanks to all the houses he’s purchased.

Now, he only needs one more to get his way. To accomplish that, he offered to pay more than market value for the home of anyone in attendance. (The neighborhood’s going to be depreciating in value soon anyway, right?) This led to instant bickering among the neighbors (Frau Farbissina looked especially eager to sell), which explains Mary Alice’s tease from a few episodes ago about his Paul’s plan would turn neighbor against neighbor. I know it’s sort of silly, but I like how simple Paul’s plan is. (And I enjoy how cartoonishly Mark Moses plays his evil side.)

Another cartoon character on this show is Gabby. I think Eva Longoria Parker’s performance usually grounds her character’s inherent silliness and shallowness, but last night Gabby threatened to do the worst thing the character has ever done.

Carmen was about to take Grace to Texas, so Gabby actually went ahead and called immigration officers so she’d be taken away, and Gabby could keep her biological daughter Grace. Since Bob was right about Gabby burning in hell had she gone through with it, Gabby jumped in, pretended to be Carmen and momentarily saved the day. Unfortunately, for her, the end result was still Carmen and Grace hitting the road. It’d be easier for us to feel for Gabby if she weren’t acting like such a selfish mom, but I think we all know Grace will be back in the picture before the end of the season.

On the other hand, I’m not really sure if Brian Austin Green’s Keith is going to be around for the end of the season.

I’m not referring to the fact that his clingy, depressed dad (John Schneider) seems intent on stealing Bree from his son. I’m not even referring to the way Keith’s proposal was spectacularly botched thanks to his dad and guest star Cynthia Watros. (“Who ordered the shrimp cocktail with the tiny engagement ring?!”) I think the most telling sign that Bree and Keith aren’t built for the long term is the fact that Bree didn’t exactly seem overjoyed by Keith proposing during her conversation with his dad afterwards.

Tom and Lynette wound up at a much more realistic/relatable place than you’d expect, given that they started the episode naked in a nursery with Susan walking in on them. I actually really enjoyed how their story evolved last night, starting with that silly beginning and the revelation about Tom(my Tripod)’s enhanced package. Tom started hassling Lynette about the fact that she never talked him up to her friends (kinda immature) and that he was a joke in the neighborhood (a valid point). It all culminated with Lynette bragging about her husband in front of the neighbors. (My favorite was the one about the Washington Monument saying “I want to be you when I grow up.)

In the end we learned that the reason Lynette sort of emasculates Tom and doesn’t talk him up is because everyone else ALREADY thinks he’s the perfect husband, and Lynette doesn’t feel like she deserves him. It’s her weird/perverse way of keeping the two of them on the same level. It was a little strange, but perfectly understandable if you have any idea how couples actually work.

Tom was a hot topic of conversation on the block, since we learned that Renee considers him the love of her life and the one who got away.

To be honest, this was my biggest letdown of the night. I really liked having Renee and Susan hang out together for Renee’s birthday (Susan is the fun one compared to a mailbox). We had learned earlier this year that Tom and Lynette shared a secret from a long time ago. At the time, the obvious guess would be that they had slept together, but I was really hoping the show would have another surprise up its sleeve.

The lesson: don’t over think “Desperate Housewives.”

So what’d you think of this episode? When did Paul get his hands on seven houses? Who else is tougher than Tom? (Lee, Susan, MJ, etc.) Finally, yikes…is Susan really the “smart” one?

NFL 2010 Week 13 Picks

Hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday.

I have a few things to be thankful for myself. I’m thankful that I did decently with my picks (9-7 week, 85-61). I’m thankful that I’ve all but clinched one of the four playoff spots in my 10-team fantasy league. (And currently sitting on top of the standings.)

Let’s see if we can keep the good vibes rolling with the week 13 picks.

HOUSTON @ PHILADELPHIA
Count me among the millions of Andre Johnson (pictured, right) fantasy owners who heaved a sigh of relief when it was announced WR Andre Johnson wouldn’t be suspended. Count me also among the millions of DeSean Jackson owners hoping for a big game against the Texans’ terrible pass defense. Then again, every time I’ve expected a shoot out, it’s been a disappointment. Watch the Eagles win by a pedestrian score like 17-7. Blech.

NEW ORLEANS @ CINCINNATI
If the Bengals switched Palmers at the QB position, would anyone notice? (I guess if they started getting good QB play people would notice — they’d know Jordan was in there.)

CHICAGO @ DETROIT
Fine, Bears, you ARE who you thought you were. You’re good. My bad.

SAN FRANCISCO @ GREEN BAY
Yes, they looked great at Monday night, but for some reason I’m not in love with the prospect of picking Troy Smith and Brian “One Concussion Away from Joining Frank Gore on IR” Westbrook on the road at Lambeau.

JACKSONVILLE @ TENNESSEE
The best part about the Andre Johnson/Cortland Finnegan fight? Usually people feel at least a little bad when someone gets their brains beat in by someone bigger, but when Finnegan got jacked up, everyone seemed delighted. Let’s just say the 2010 Titans aren’t the most cohesive group.

DENVER @ KANSAS CITY
Denver is kind of a mess and, on top of that, Chiefs coach Todd Haley will be looking for revenge after what he perceived as the Broncos running up the score in their earlier matchup. Dwayne Bowe might catch 7 TDs. (And I might bash my head against a wall 7 times for trading him to my fantasy football league nemesis five weeks ago.)

CLEVELAND @ MIAMI
The Dolphins are the kind of team who seem to stay mathematically alive for the playoffs until the very last week, even though they have no chance of actually doing anything. (The Jaguars are also guilty of this.) Look for a win to help continue that trend.

BUFFALO @ MINNESOTA
Looking forward to finding out how the Bills blow this game as the Vikes huddle together to sing “Kumbaya” with their new coach.

WASHINGTON @ N.Y. GIANTS
I watched the Giants shakily defeat the Jaguars at home last week. They’re do for a big-time win where they pummel someone to hook us into thinking they’re one of the league’s best teams. (Remember when people were saying that way back in November?)

OAKLAND @ SAN DIEGO
I’m looking for the Chargers to win all their games from here on out. Until they get to the playoffs, of course.

CAROLINA @ SEATTLE
The Panthers showed me some heart last week, while the Seahawks rolled over. I can’t believe I’m doing this, but I’m going to go with the team which, two weeks ago, I said I would bet against if my life depended on me getting a prediction right.

ATLANTA @ TAMPA BAY
I was all set to pick the Falcons, but then the Bucs realized safety Sabby Piscitelli this week. That bum spent more time chasing after receivers scoring long touchdowns than he did tackling people. Now, I feel strangely rejuvenated about our chances this year.

ST. LOUIS @ ARIZONA
What is it about the Cardinals and Monday Night Football that makes their personnel go into instant-classic, post-game rants? For some reason, Arizona is sticking with Derek Anderson at QB, so I’m going to go ahead and pick the other team.

DALLAS @ INDIANAPOLIS
Talk about how Peyton Manning is losing it (without many of his top weapons) is getting louder, so I look to him to unleash a 350 yard, 4TD performance this week. (What has two thumbs and is facing a guy who has Manning as his fantasy QB? This guy!)

PITTSBURGH @ BALTIMORE
Even if Big Ben weren’t banged up, I’d be tempted to pick the Ravens. The Steelers haven’t looked quite right in a few weeks.

N.Y. JETS @ NEW ENGLAND
It’s hard to do better than this Monday Night Game. It’s a division game between hated rivals, and they’re tied for the best record in the conference. Even though the Jets had been pulling games out of their butts before their big win over the Bengals, I’ll go with the Pats this time around. It just FEELS like they should play a third time this year, with each team having won once.

America's Next Top Recap: The Italian Job

It turned out to be a pretty entertaining cycle of “America’s Next Top Model” — especially when you consider last night’s result was pretty much a foregone conclusion since the first few weeks of the season.

As with most season finales, not that much happened in the beginning other than the two finalists — Ann and Chelsey — spouting off variations of “I can’t believe I’ve made it this far” and “I deserve to win because I want it more.” (Ok, so maybe that second one was mostly Chelsey, who was edited to look more desperate than ever.)

Even with only two girls left, there was a lot to do. They were whisked off to their Vogue Italia shoot, where the photographer raved over both of them and the bugs in the field served as the paparazzi.

From there, Ann and Chelsey continued to their Cover Girl commercial shoot. Instead of having to learn to say “lash blast” in Italian on camera, the girls would film their scenes together and record their voice-over later. This is how you know Tyra was REALLY determined to have this cycle’s winner be taken seriously — she didn’t want to saddle them with a script they were destined to flub. (Plus, the contestants this year already embarrassed themselves during the roller skating fiasco.)

Mr. Jay praised both of their performances, which made it especially weird when we saw the commercial and it was HORRIBLE. To be fair, it wasn’t so much Ann and Chelsey’s performance (although they DID enjoy the hell out of that ice cream more than they played up their makeup). The main problem was the embarrassing production values. I understand not everything can be as high-brown as “Modelli Folli”, but still…)

From there the girls shot their Cover Girl print ad (more on that a bit later) and met with an IMG Models big wig, in which he declared that Chelsey had more personality than Ann, and I declared “duh” and rolled my eyes.

Whoops! I forgot to mention the part where Ann and Chelsey’s families stopped by, and they were both absolutely adorable. The fact that Ann could quite possibly be the shortest person in her family amused me to no end. Meanwhile, Chelsey’s mom was adorable, and I liked her debating whether she should’ve told Tyra that her son has a huge crush on her.

Time for the runway show!

Coming into this episode, I thought Chelsey’s best chance to win would be to absolutely blow Ann away during the Roberto Cavalli runway show. Even more so than the “personality” thing, Chelsey’s biggest advantage over Ann was her walk (probably the best this season), especially when you consider Ann probably had the worst.

Well that didn’t happen. Nerves seemed to get the best Chelsey because her walk was stiff, awkward and the worst we’ve seen this season from her. Meanwhile, Ann’s walk was stiff and awkward, but actually managed to be an improvement over what we’ve seen from her. (Fortunately, she didn’t stumble until after the show when she was backstage.) In the end, the fashion show was pretty much a wash. (Ok, Chelsey gets the win because she didn’t have a psychotic look on her face like Ann did).

Time for the judges’ panel! Tyra, Nigel and ALT (in a particularly hideous barbershop cloak) were joined by Mr. Jay (taking a break from directing awful commercials) and Roberto Cavalli, who seems like he would’ve been smoking at the judges’ table if he’d been allowed.

All kidding aside, Cavalli and his broken English is welcome to stop by the panel at least once a month as far as I’m concerned. My favorite moment was during his critique of Ann’s Cover Girl print ad in which he pointed out that, “You look terrified…I like this photo!” (I mostly enjoyed the implication that he has a fetish for scared women.)

Both Cover Girl print ads were stunning. I suppose Chelsey’s ad kinda/sorta didn’t necessarily look like her, and her makeup wasn’t apparent. (Personally, I don’t think that’s a problem — you don’t want it to be caked on, do you?) Ann, on the other hand, had a haunting picture that was also fascinating because it was unlike any other Cover Girl ad I’ve ever seen.

And that pretty much sums up the appeal of Ann and explains why she won. (Cavalli broke it down thusly: Chelsey was great for American fashion, while Ann was ideal for Italian fashion.) She was pretty much unlike every other girl in the competition, and that makes her instantly standout. She’s going to get great shots and great gigs without even meaning to. Chelsey was constantly praised for her work ethic and her knowledge of the industry, and she’ll certainly get work as a model. It’s just that no one ever got super excited over working with Chelsey.

In the end, it was always going to be Ann, but I’ll give the show credit for working its ass off to drum up, at least, a shred of drama right before the moment Ann’s face popped up on that screen. Her glee and joy at winning was absolutely delightful. (Chelsey declaring that she felt cheated was mostly a bummer, but a little petty.)

So what’d you think of this episode? We know who Jane (Ann) and Kayla (Chelsey) were rooting for, but which team were Chris and Liz on? How funny was it when Ann left Chelsey hanging with her high-five during panel? (Who says Ann doesn’t have personality?) Finally, is this the best top 2 since Danielle and Joanie?

Thanks for watching this cycle along with me. See you in 2011.

Glee: Let's Talk About Sectionals

“Glee” went to Sectionals last night. More importantly, the show put aside its anti-bullying crusade – for one week at least – and delivered the funniest, most entertaining episode in a while. (Which, I think, is important for a comedy series.)

My two favorite episodes this season have probably been “Duets” and last night’s “Special Education.” It’s no accident that both of these eps eschewed big-name guest stars, delivering heavy-handed messages in a clumsy way, or shoehorning a single pop star’s songs into the plot.

It was almost as if the only goal of the episode was to make us laugh as much as possible and provide us with dazzling musical performances. (Imagine that!)

The hour had New Directions traveling to Sectionals to face the Dalton Academy Warblers (with new member Kurt) and the Hipsters, those GED-getting golden oldies.

One thing the show has done consistently well this season (consistency isn’t really its strong suit) is display its self-aware side. Emma’s slam of Will’s predictable set-list (Rachel-Finn ballad, Mercedes glory note, and scene!) was a funny way for the show to address how formulaic it can be at time. It also convinced Mr. Schue that he needed to shake things up.

If you read these recaps, you know that a more low-key Mr. Schue has been winning me back lately. Well, that mostly went out the window last night because Will went back to his moronic ways. First, there’s his continued quest for Emma. Didn’t he agree to back off after the “Rocky Horror” episode? Why was he trying to subtly win her back by inviting her to Sectionals? As harsh of a twist as it was to have Emma marry Dr. Carl (a silent John Stamos cameo), maybe it’ll finally get Will to back the f--- up! Honestly, isn’t there anyone in that town besides Emma or his ex-wife that he can date? It’s pathetic.

Slightly less pathetic is how bendable of a choir director he is. Just because Emma made a snide, insightful comment about his set list, it doesn’t mean he had to go and rip Rachel and Finn’s solos away from them. (And this is coming from someone who has been begging “Glee” to further showcase its talented ensemble.) As Finn said, “you don’t bench the star quarterback before the big game” just to make sure everyone plays. Will’s heart was in the right place, but this made him look like the flake he is. (At least he finally stood up to self-absorbed Rachel.)

Unfortunately for Rachel and Finn, this mini-argument ended with Santana revealing that she’d slept with Finn, who was still telling Rachel that he was a virgin. I thought they’d patch things up by the end of the episode since (as Finn pointed out) he slept with Santana while he and Rachel were broken up, so it wasn’t like he cheated on her. The only problem was that she had sought solace in “am-badass-ador” Puck’s arms and, even though he shut her down before they could really do anything, Finn felt betrayed.

As season 2 of “Glee” has really become “The Kurt Show”, my biggest complaint has been the marginalizing of Lea Michele, probably the show’s breakout star from the first year. This season, Rachel has had nothing to do besides acting like a selfish, annoying bitch and…well, that’s pretty much it.

Well, last night she did that, but Michele finally (THANKFULLY) got to play up Rachel’s insecurities (her jealousy of sexy Santana) that help explain why she’s the neurotic mess she is. She also got to play tender in her scenes with Kurt last night. (Those two are much friendlier when they’re not competing for solos.)

Speaking of Kurt, he enlisted Rachel’s help in his audition for a solo with the Warblers. When we first saw Dalton Academy and its music group a few weeks back, I felt like it all seemed too good to be true and I waited for the other shoe to drop. Well, the shoe didn’t really drop last night, but it kinda got a little loose on the foot because it turns out the Warblers preach uniformity and take themselves WAY too seriously.

We’ll see if anything else comes of that because we’ll be seeing more of the Warblers following their first-place with New Directions at Sectionals. Personally, I hate ties (everything should have a winner and a loser) and I think they’re copouts, but I understand why the show did it from a storyline standpoint.

Next week is the Christmas episode, but before we look forward, let’s look back at this week’s musical performances.

“Don’t Cry for Me Argentina”…A-: The dual Rachel/Kurt vocal was reminiscent of their take on “Defying Gravity” from season 1. Only this time, I didn’t think it was nearly as balanced – I thought this was a terrible choice for Kurt’s audition (why is that a good idea for an all-guy group?), so I didn’t enjoy his portion as much. (Though Blaine motioning Kurt to put his hands down as he was about to emote was gold!) Lea Michele, on the other hand, was BRILLIANT. This was a reminder of why she was the star of this show, once upon a time.

“The Living Years”…C+: Too obviously pre-recorded for my taste. I think it would’ve been funny if the Hipsters were the glee kids in old people makeup. (They TOTALLY had a Mercedes, and they even had someone in a wheelchair! Come on!)

“Hey Soul Sister”…B: Other than Darren Criss’ unbelievably charismatic lead vocal performance, this was actually pretty meh. (“Teenage Dream” was much better.) Blaine’s hamminess did make me a bit suspicious about his advice to Kurt to not “try too hard.” Could he be intentionally trying to keep Kurt down? (The guy is pretty much too good to be true so far, so why not?)

“I’ve Had the Time of My Life”…B-: Dianna Agron and Chord Overstreet have pretty good chemistry, but that was about the only thing they brought to the table in this cutesy and totally unnecessary cover. (At least it was better than the Black Eyed Peas’ version.)

“Valerie”…B+: Great to see Santana get a solo lead, and she mostly worked it. (I felt she could’ve pushed it out even more.) Mike and a-dolt-erer Brittany’s dancing was excellent, but why is that such a big deal for what’s supposed to be a singing competition?

“Dog Days Are Over”…B+: Is there any reason at all this couldn’t have just been a solo for Tina? Cute choreography, and I’d love to tell you more, but my DVR cut this number off right towards the end. Sorry.

So what’d you think of this episode? Do you fantasize about your own funeral? Did you miss Sue at all and can you think of any other comedy that can still be really good without its funniest character? Finally, how long will Lauren stick around New Directions? (She sure picked up those dance moves pretty quickly for someone who dissed show choir right before they went on.)