Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Dancing with the Stars: The New 30

I was especially interested in seeing last night’s episode of “Dancing with the Stars” because the show would be introducing the Lindy hop, my preferred style of dance for the better part of the last six years.

So it was both disappointing and a pleasant surprise that my two favorite routines of the evening were both Argentine tangos (also making its debut on the show.) As for the style of dancing I was REALLY looking forward to seeing, it was more like, “Would you like some Lindy hop with all those lifts?)

In honor of my and Samantha Harris’ sore throat (I SWEAR they’re not related), let’s take a cough drop and look at yesterday’s couples, in order of appearance:

David Alan Grier and Kym: I don’t remember these two doing anything really wrong in their Lindy hop. Then again, I don’t really remember too much about the routine in general (except for Grier’s cummerbund and a dual cartwheel) so that may be the problem. If you look at the brief footage of the Lindy hop club David and Kym went to, people weren’t flying through the air at all times — just sayin’.

Sadly, this would be the first of many cases in which the pros (unfamiliar with this style of dance) just seemingly threw a bunch of side-by-side dancing and lifts that have little to do with the Lindy hop into their routines. (I hate to go all Len on you, but somebody has to since Len seemed to take the night off from being all Len-ny.)

Lil’ Kim and Derek: This was one of my two favorite dances of the night and the first to score a 10 this year. Once again, Kim surprisingly looks the part of a ballroom dancer. One of the few instances in which Len DID go all Len-ny and slammed Derek for not interpreting the dance correctly. I didn’t care because I was mostly mesmerized by the move in which Derek quickly lifted Kim in the air and she kept her leg parallel to the ground. You can tell these two just enjoy each other. Kim is locked in a super tight battle with Shawn Johnson for that last spot in the top 3 this season.

Chuck Wicks and “Jules”: Question: if Chuck is so scared of landing on his head, why not just have him be the one who flips Julianne? Ugh, I’m just not into this “cute-by-design” couple at all. The judges seem to feel the same way, throwing out words like “competent” as “praise.”

Lawrence Taylor and Edyta:
LT seems to have inherited the “: It’s Complicated” rehearsal mantle from Denise Richards. He’s still WAY over-thinking his dances and he and Edyta seemed to lose patience with each other. Appears to suffer from an inability to have fun. Still, while his tango WAS a bit plodding, Len giving it a 5 is probably the most preposterous score this year. Seriously. Finally, what is Alec Mazo doing with his time when he’s not helping former football players with their tango as a favor to his wife?

Ty Murray and Chelsie: Looked a LOT like Steve Wozniak when they started showing his video package (a brief oopsie by the producers). Do I dare say this was my favorite Lindy hop of the evening? Yes I do (if only for authenticity’s sake). Ty is still awkward when he’s dancing on his own, but he’s not nearly the train wreck he was in week 1. If you had bet me $5,000 that he’d EVER get a 9 after his week 1 cha cha, I would’ve taken that bet (and I would’ve lost). Chelsie should just change her name to Annie Sullivan (You know, because of “The Miracle Worker”? Nevermind, I’m a dork.)

Steve Wozniak and Karina: I liked that he looked at his improvement from a 10 to 12 as a “20 percent increase.” What else can I add that I haven’t already said about this guy (other than Karina wearing almost nothing to compensate for Edyta being almost fully-clothed)? I’ll turn it over to someone else. Who’s meaner? Bruno for cruelly saying the only thing Woz and his tango brought back from Buenos Aires was the stench (Argentinean burn!) or my girlfriend Erica for saying, “Maybe if he didn’t ride around on a Segway all the time, he wouldn’t be so out of shape.”

Melissa Rycroft and Tony: She makes extremely difficult routines look very easy. Unfortunately, this was really a freestyle masquerading as a Lindy hop, and her final lift was executed better in their rehearsal footage than it was live. Of course, since she’s destined to be in the finals, no one seemed to care and she got a 29 out of 30.

Holly Madison and Dmitry: I actually think she’s gotten a little better every week (emphasis on “a little”). Most of her work is still train wreck-y (almost fell off a stool this week) and she is almost certainly going home after being in the bottom two AND losing the dance off last week. Hopefully she can go home and go back to wearing shirts that allow people to clearly see her bra and rest her injured ribs (which, by the way, only hurt every time you breathe.)

Steve-O and Lacey: I had high expectations for Lacey’s/Katy Perry’s Lindy hop routine, since it’s right in her wheelhouse. However, there’s nothing she can do to keep Steve-O from constantly being a step behind. Am I the only one who didn’t think it was a terrible idea for him to perform in his clown costume?

Gilles Marini and Cheryl: The highest compliment you can give a celeb on this show (unless you’re third-place finisher Stacy Keibler) is that you can’t tell which person is the pro when they’re dancing. This is absolutely true in Gilles case. From the slicked-back hair and immaculate costume to the hot moves on the dance floor, he looked the part of an Argentine tango-er. Best routine of the season, so far. It also turns out he’s a brilliant actor, because I actually believed he was worried about his dance. It was so hot that Carrie Ann looked completely hot and bothered.

Shawn Johnson and Mark: These two are consistently delivering the most entertaining rehearsal footage. (Their trip to that gymnastics center was entertaining in every way). I couldn’t tell if their shirts said “Shark” or “Shmark” (probably the former). I agree that her steps were a bit plodding and the dance didn’t flow as well, but she had very good Lindy hop posture. Why did “too many lifts” become an issue all of a sudden in the evening’s last dance? I believe the goofy outfits (and the fact that she didn’t have heart broken on “The Bachelor”) contributed to her being underscored.

So what’d you think of this episode? Wasn’t Samantha Harris actually a little more coherent than usual? (I think her cold made her actually THINK more about her words?) Do you think it was too early for the season’s first 30? (I don’t buy into that — a 30 is a 30 no matter when it comes in the season.) Finally, which two celebs are going home? (I think we’ll say goodbye to Holly and Steve-O.)

18 comments:

Anita said...

I don't agree with you that Shawn and Mark's outfits or lack of a broken heart had anything to do with their scores.

They had a noticeable lack of dance steps in their routine, as I commented repeatedly while it was still going on. I would have made the same comment no matter what they were wearing.

Besides having just as many tricks in her routine - I counted 8 for Melissa and 7 for Shawn - Melissa did a dance rather than a gymnastics exhibition, and is clearly the superior dancer.

John said...

Anita,

Thanks for responding. I totally agree that, when it comes down to it, the lack of dance moves in Shawn's routine is what did her in and caused her to get a lower score than Melissa and a few of the other frontrunners.

However, I'm still of the belief that those dumb outfits they were wearing WERE distracting in the same way a weird arrangement and bad singing by Harold Wheeler's band can be distracting and take away from the quality of a dance. Let's just say the outfits didn't do them any favors the way a more authentic outfit would have. (Like Gilles and Cheryl's look for their tango.)

As far as Melissa is concerned, she's an incredible dancer (CLEARLY better than Shawn), but I freely admit to a sort of bias against her since the judges (and the show’s producers) are so obviously pushing her for the win. (To me there’s NO WAY she was just one point worse than Gilles.) Can't say I blame them because being humiliated on one ABC show, then emerging triumphant on another one is too good to pass up. I’m also the kind of DWTS fan that leans toward people who DON’T look like they’ve been dancing most of their lives. (I’m not proud of my bias, but it’s there.)

The irony is that she's SO good, she doesn't need the shameless pimping. As you noted yourself, Melissa and Shawn had a pretty even amount of tricks, but only Shawn got called out for it. Then again, I was pretty disappointed in the general lack of actual Lindy hop moves in yesterday's episode.

Erica said...

i wasn't a fan of gilles at first, but i've officially jumped on the bandwagon.

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and fussy in all the information we give. We should be especially aware in giving opinion that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving recommendation which we don't imitate when it damages those who transport us at our word.

allen

[url=http://allen-72.webs.com/apps/blog/]allen[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and discriminating in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be extraordinarily painstaking in giving advice that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving counsel which we don't follow when it damages those who take us at our word.

lopper

[url=http://lopper-51.webs.com/apps/blog/]lopper[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and particular in all the advice we give. We should be strikingly careful in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving advise which we don't follow when it damages those who transport us at our word.

impact wrench

[url=http://impact-wrench-52.webs.com/apps/blog/]impact wrench[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and particular in all the information we give. We should be signally prudent in giving guidance that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advise which we don't mind when it damages those who take us at our word.

incra

[url=http://incra-34.webs.com/apps/blog/]incra[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and perceptive in all the advice we give. We should be signally painstaking in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving counsel which we don't tag along when it damages those who transport us at our word.

mosquito magnet

[url=http://mosquito-magnet-66.webs.com/apps/blog/]mosquito magnet[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be chary and perceptive in all the information we give. We should be extraordinarily prudent in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving recommendation which we don't imitate when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

bonsai tools

[url=http://bonsai-tools-75.webs.com/apps/blog/]bonsai tools[/url]

Anonymous said...

A man begins icy his perceptiveness teeth the initially time he bites on holiday more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

To be a adroit charitable being is to procure a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an skill to trust undeterminable things beyond your own control, that can take you to be shattered in unequivocally exceptional circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly weighty with the prerequisite of the honest autobiography: that it is based on a trust in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a prize, something somewhat feeble, but whose mere special attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a adroit charitable being is to procure a amiable of openness to the world, an ability to trust aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can front you to be shattered in uncommonly outermost circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably outstanding with the fettle of the ethical compulsion: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a sparkler, something somewhat tenuous, but whose mere special handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a adroit charitable being is to from a philanthropic of openness to the mankind, an ability to trust unsure things beyond your own control, that can lead you to be shattered in unequivocally exceptional circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly weighty with the condition of the righteous autobiography: that it is based on a trust in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a sparkler, something kind of feeble, but whose acutely precise attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

Work out ferments the humors, casts them into their proper channels, throws bad redundancies, and helps feather in those confidential distributions, without which the body cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the incarnation role of with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

Exercise ferments the humors, casts them into their right channels, throws eccentric redundancies, and helps nature in those secretive distributions, without which the fuselage cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the typification role of with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

A not many days ago, we analyzed the 2010 fantasy baseball pitcher sleepers to sentinel in 2010. Today, we head for a look at the more high-level side of the equation - invention baseball hitters sleepers.
[url=http://www.2bo4.com/member/70187/ ]Jack[/url]

Anonymous said...

kredyty bez zaswiadczen o dochodach
pożyczki pozabankowe bez zaświadczeń
pożyczki bez bik na dowód
pożyczki vivus
kliknij w ten link, a zobaczysz więcej
pożyczki pozabankowe 5000 zł
informacje

Anonymous said...

Thanks for finally talking about > "Dancing with the Stars: The New 30"
< Liked it!

Here is my homepage - carnival cruise